No civil works, no tags
Locate your people where GPS can't reach
Metrosafe turns your stations' existing Wi-Fi and the smartphones your team already carries into real-time location. And when you need to know which train and which carriage an officer is in, that adds on without touching your infrastructure.
ISO/IEC 27001 · ENS conformity · Aligned with NIS2 and CER
- accuracy in station
- 5-10 m
- publication latency
- <5 s
- configurable refresh
- 15-30 s
- availability (SLA)
- 99.95 %
- beacons in your infrastructure
- 0
accuracy in station
publication latency
configurable refresh
availability (SLA)
beacons in your infrastructure
The starting point
Underground, knowing where your team is stops being trivial
Above ground, location has been a solved problem for twenty years. Forty metres below, surrounded by concrete, steel and curves, it is not. And that is precisely where it matters most.
GPS does not reach
Classic RTLS means building works
Tags have to be managed
How it works
Three pieces, none of them new to your infrastructure
The app runs on the terminals your officers already carry. The measurement relies on access points that are already mounted. The only thing added is software.
01 · Terminal
It measures, it does not guess
Wi-Fi RTT/FTM (IEEE 802.11mc) measures the round-trip time of the signal to each access point: an actual distance, not an estimate derived from received signal strength. The app dynamically picks the most reliable source between Wi-Fi, cellular and GPS, stores what it cannot send, and restarts itself.
02 · Fusion
It knows where walking is possible
Probabilistic filters combine the measurements and constrain them to the actual layout of platforms, concourses and tunnels. A position that would fall inside a wall is discarded before publication; multipath and non-line-of-sight measurements are detected and downgraded rather than allowed to contaminate the result.
03 · Portal
And it leaves a record
Live map, history and event replay. Two-factor, role-based access, an audit trail of who looked at what, and history export whenever you need the data outside the portal.
On-board layer
And when the officer boards the train?
That is where station location runs out: the reference moves, the car is a metal box, and knowing somebody is seven metres from the platform edge does not tell you whether they are on the train that is pulling away. The on-board layer answers that with an identity instead of a coordinate.
One beacon per carriage, adhesive and battery-powered, fitted during a depot visit. The officer’s phone reads it and the system publishes the train, the car and the station it is at. No cabling, no power take-off from the vehicle, and not a metre of platform or tunnel touched: the beacons go in the rolling stock, not in your infrastructure.
-
An identity, not an estimate
Car 3 of train 4207. No error radius and no room for doubt: either the phone sees that beacon or it does not.
-
You can go and meet the train
Knowing which car the officer is in on the service arriving in two minutes turns a search into an appointment, at the right door.
-
And it saves you surveying the tunnels
Between stations, car identity replaces the coordinate. The radio survey can be limited to whichever stations matter to you.
It is optional. The base layer works on its own, and this is added when on-board service justifies it.
The difference
What you will not have to install
The comparison is not about accuracy: it is about what reaching that accuracy costs. An anchor-based system gives you centimetres in exchange for an infrastructure project. We give you metres in exchange for nothing.
| Beacon and tag based RTLS | Metrosafe | |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware in the station | Dedicated anchors per zone | None: the Wi-Fi you already have |
| Hardware on the person | An active tag to hand out and charge | Their corporate smartphone |
| Civil works | Cabling, power and mounting | None |
| Upfront investment | High and proportional to zones | Minimal |
| Time to service | Months, with night-time windows | Weeks, without stopping service |
| Vendor lock-in | Verticalised by the supplier | Any FTM-capable access point |
| Scaling to another network | A brand new infrastructure project | A replication playbook |
The on-board layer does fit one beacon per carriage, but inside the rolling stock: adhesive, battery-powered and fitted in the depot. No platform and no tunnel is touched, and people still carry no tag of any kind.
Security and compliance
Built to get through your security committee
In critical infrastructure the final technical call is not made by the person who needs the system, but by the person accountable for the network. This is the part that matters to them.
- TLS encryption in transit and at rest
- Two-factor authentication (2FA)
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Network microsegmentation
- Rate limiting and OWASP API protection
- Audit trail of access and actions
- Continuous SAST and DAST in CI/CD
- External cybersecurity audit
- Configurable data retention
- Anonymisation where the use case allows it
Regulatory framework
- Spanish National Security Framework (ENS) and CCN-STIC guidance
- ISO/IEC 27001 · ISO 9001 · UNE 166002
- Aligned with NIS2 and CER, the two European directives raising the bar on cybersecurity and resilience in transport.
- ISO 9001
- ISO/IEC 27001
- UNE 166002
- ENS conformity
- Innovative SME
Locating people is personal data. Metrosafe is deployed with a legal basis, prior information to the worker, bounded retention and anonymisation where the use case allows it.
How worker data is handledWhere it fits
Wherever Wi-Fi is dense and GPS is absent
Metro is the anchor case, but nothing about the pattern is rail-specific: as soon as Wi-Fi coverage is in place and satellites cannot reach, the answer is the same.
Metro and urban rail
Tunnels and interchange hubs
Airports and hospitals
Facility management and logistics
Getting started
Start with one line, not the whole network
A scoped pilot of 8 to 16 weeks over one line or a set of stations. With numeric acceptance criteria agreed in writing before it starts, so there is no argument at the end about whether it worked.
-
01
Survey
Inventory of FTM-capable access points, station layouts and a map of constraints.
-
02
Go live
App on the terminals, server and portal in service, telemetry and security active.
-
03
Measurement
Accuracy and latency campaigns per station, against the acceptance criteria agreed upfront.
-
04
Decision
A report with real metrics your committee can use directly in the procurement file.
Frequently asked
What people ask before the demo
How do you locate personnel where there is no GPS?
Do we need to install beacons or hand out tags?
Can you tell which train and which carriage an officer is in?
What accuracy do you get?
Does it meet European security requirements?
How long does a deployment take?
Tell us about your network
Let us know how many stations you run, how many terminals are in service and what you need to solve. You get a concrete pilot proposal back, not a brochure.
- +34 924 090 608
- [email protected]
- Campus Universitario, Avda. de la Investigación S/N, Edificio PCTEX, Oficina 2.1
06006 Badajoz